NAT Slipstream <–!–>

A new research has demonstrated a technique that allows an attacker to bypass firewall protection and remotely access any TCP/UDP service on a victim machine.

Called NAT Slipstreaming, the method involves sending the target a link to a malicious site that, when visited, ultimately triggers the gateway to open any TCP/UDP port on the victim, thereby circumventing browser-based port restrictions.

“NAT Slipstreaming exploits the user’s browser in conjunction with the Application Level Gateway (ALG) connection tracking mechanism built into NATs, routers, and firewalls by chaining internal IP extraction via timing attack or WebRTC, automated remote MTU and IP fragmentation discovery, TCP packet size massaging, TURN authentication misuse, precise packet boundary control, and protocol confusion through browser abuse,” Kamkar said in an analysis.

Researchers technique was carried out using a NetGear Nighthawk R7000 router running Linux kernel version 2.6.36.4.

Network address translation (NAT) is the process where a network device, such as a firewall, remaps an IP address space into another by modifying network address information in the IP header of packets while they are in transit.

The main advantage is that it limits the number of public IP addresses used in an organization’s internal network and improves security by letting a single public IP address to be shared among multiple systems.

NAT Slipstreaming works by taking advantage of TCP and IP packet segmentation to remotely adjust the packet boundaries and using it to create a TCP/UDP packet starting with a SIP method such as REGISTER or INVITE.

SIP (short for Session Initiation Protocol) is a communications protocol used for initiating, maintaining, and terminating real-time multimedia sessions for voice, video, and messaging applications.

In other words, a mix of packet segmentation and smuggling SIP requests in HTTP can be used to trick the NAT ALG into opening arbitrary ports for inbound connections to the client.

To achieve this, a large HTTP POST request is sent with an ID and a hidden web form that points to an attack server running a packet sniffer, which is used to capture the MTU size, data packet size, TCP and IP header sizes, among others, and subsequently transmitting the size data back to the victim client over a separate POST message.

Connect to TCP/UDP via Packet Alteration
In the next stage, the victim’s internal IP address is extracted using WebRTC ICE on modern browsers such as Chrome or Firefox or by executing a timing attack on common gateways (192.168.*.1, 10.0.0.1, and local networks).

Just as the packets reach the attack server and it’s determined that the SIP packet isn’t rewritten with the public IP address, an automatic message is sent back to the client, asking it to adjust its packet size to a new boundary based on the data previously gleaned from the sniffer.

Armed with the right packet boundary, the NAT is deceived into thinking, “this is a legitimate SIP registration and from a SIP client on the victim’s machine,” eventually causing the NAT to open up the port in the original packet sent by the victim.

“The router will now forward any port the attacker chooses back to the internal victim, all from simply browsing to a website,” Kamkar said.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s